Courtesy of Tris Pharma Medical Affairs.

This site is intended for U.S. healthcare professionals only.

Clinical Trial Scales Scales used in clinical trials of ADHD Scales used in clinical trials of ADHD

The rating scales commonly used in clinical trials are used to measure the efficacy of interventions. Some specific functions of ADHD clinical trial rating scales include:

Determine if a patient meets the DSM criteria for a diagnosis of ADHD (See Epidemiology Section)

Assess current symptoms of ADHD

Evaluate response to treatment for ADHD

Safety scales

The rating scales commonly used in clinical trials are used to measure the efficacy of interventions. Some specific functions of ADHD clinical trial rating scales include:

Determine if a patient meets the DSM criteria for a diagnosis of ADHD (See Epidemiology Section)

Assess current symptoms of ADHD

Evaluate response to treatment for ADHD

Safety scales

Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale (ACDS)56,57

Available from L. Adler, MD at: adultADHD@med.nyu.edu
Age Administration Content Scoring Use

  • Adults

  • Clinician

  • Semi-structured interview
  • First part is a retrospective assessment of childhood ADHD symptoms
  • Second part is a prompted, adult-specific assessment of the 18 ADHD symptoms that have been present in the past 6 months

  • Subjective

  • Diagnosis
  • Symptom assessment

Age Administration Content Scoring Use

  • 6-12 years

  • Parent/caregivers
  • Teachers

  • Home/school versions
  • 18-item scale divided into subscales for hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattentiveness
  • Assesses symptoms of ADHD according to DSM-5 criteria62
  • Separate scoring profiles for impairment in boys and girls

  • 4-point frequency scale
  • 0 = never/rarely to 3 = very often
  • Raw scores are converted to percentiles

  • Screening
  • Diagnosis
  • Treatment evaluation

For preschoolers and adults, ADHD-RS-IV can be used (See Diagnostic Scales section)

A non-official version for adults called ADHD-RS-DSM V has been used in clinical studies58

ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS)59

Available from L. Adler, MD at: adultADHD@med.nyu.edu

Age Administration Content Scoring Use

  • Adults

  • Clinician

  • Semi-structured interview assesses each symptom domain of ADHD
  • Captures symptoms of ADHD as they present in adulthood
  • Suggested prompts for each item to improve interrater reliability
  • 9 inattentive items alternate with 9 hyperactive-impulsive items
  • Each item includes a series of additional questions that the interviewer can use to further prompt the participant

  • 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe)
  • The maximum total score for the scale is 54 points, with 27 points for each subscale
  • The total score is the sum of the inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive subscales

  • Symptom assessment

Age Administration Content Scoring Use

  • Children
  • Adults

  • Physician

  • Two companion 1-item measures assess severity of symptoms and improvement
  • CGI-S assesses the severity of ADHD at a given point in time: Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?
  • CGI-I provides a "global" or "holistic" change in severity from the initiation of treatment (baseline) over one specified time period: Compared with the patient’s condition at admission to the project [prior to medication initiation], this patient’s condition is [score]?
    Rating of "minimal improvement" (CGI-I score = 3)

CGI-S

  • 0 = not assessed
  • 1 = normal, not at all ill
  • 2 = borderline mentally ill
  • 3 = mildly ill
  • 4 = moderately ill
  • 5 = markedly ill
  • 6 = severely ill
  • 7 = among the most extremely ill patients

CGI-I

  • 1 = very much improved since the initiation of treatment
  • 2 = much improved
  • 3 = minimally improved
  • 4 = no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment)
  • 5 = minimally worse
  • 6 = much worse

  • Treatment evaluation

Brief, easy to use, and captures clinical impressions when administered by an experienced clinician.

Age Administration Content Scoring Use

  • 6-18 years

  • Parent/caregivers
  • Teachers
  • Self-report

  • 10 items designed to evaluate the frequency and severity (as observed over the preceding week) of the child’s impulsivity, emotional outbursts, and motor hyperactivity

  • Age- and gender-specific
  • Scores >65 are in the clinical range for ADHD

  • Screening
  • Diagnosis
  • Treatment evaluation

Age Administration Content Scoring Use

  • Preschool and school-aged children
  • Adult version (Adult workplace environment PERMP1)

  • Teachers
  • Clinicians
  • Investigator

  • To assess compliance and academic productivity in school children (children/ adolescents) or workplace environment (adults)
  • Assesses the time course of medication effect over the course of a day
  • 10-minute timed test in which the number of problems attempted and number of problems correct are recorded
  • Math test that measures effortful performance in preschool and school-aged children
  • Series of 10-minute, skill-adjusted math tests comprising five pages of 80 math problems each (400 in total) to investigate impairments seen in the home and academic setting as a result of ADHD
  • Administered in classroom setting (laboratory classroom)

  • Determines the number of problems attempted and the number of problems correctly answered
  • Total PERMP score for each test is calculated by adding the number of math problems attempted (PERMP-A) plus the number answered correctly (PERMP-C)
  • A higher PERMP score indicates better performance
  • Tailored to a child’s math ability level

  • Screening/ placement test
  • Treatment evaluation

Age Administration Content

  • School-aged children and adults

  • Teachers
  • Other raters

  • Assesses functional impairment related to ADHD in the classroom, including the performance of academic tasks, following class rules, and interacting with peers and adults in the classroom

Scoring Use

Level of impairment on a scale of 0 to 6

  • 0 = none
  • 1 = slight
  • 2 = mild
  • 3 = moderate
  • 4 = severe
  • 5 = very severe
  • 6 = maximal impairment

  • Used to assess the time course of treatment effects in laboratory classroom studies or adult workplace environment

Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS)65,66

Available by contacting: Fred W. Reimherr, MD, Mood Disorders Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah Health Science Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84132.

Age Administration Content

  • Adults

  • Investigator
  • Self

61 questions in 7 symptom categories:

  • Attention difficulties
  • Hyperactivity/restlessness
  • Temper
  • Affective lability
  • Emotional overreactivity
  • Disorganization
  • Impulsivity

Scoring Use

Scoring scale is 0 to 2

  • 0 = not present
  • 1 = mild
  • 2 = clearly present

Summarizes each of the 7 categories on a 0-to-4 scale

  • 0 = none
  • 1 = mild
  • 2 = moderate
  • 3 = quite a bit
  • 4 = very much

  • Measures severity of target symptoms of adults with ADHD using the Utah Criteria, which Wender developed

Subset of 25 questions associated with ADHD

As a child I was (or had)

3

concentration problems easily distracted

4

anxious worrying

5

nervous fidgety

6

inattentive daydreaming

7

hot- or short-tempered low boiling point

9

temper outbursts tantrums

10

trouble with stick-to-it-tiveness not following through. failing to finish things started

11

stubborn strong-willed

12

sad or blue depressed unhappy

15

disobedient with parents rebellious sassy

16

low opinion of myself

17

irritable

20

moody ups and downs

21

angry

24

acting without thinking impulsive

25

tendency to be immature

26

guilty feelings regretful

27

losing control of myself

28

tendency to be or act irrational

29

unpopular with other children didn't keep friends for long didn't get along with other children

40

trouble seeing things from someone else's point of view

41

trouble with authorities trouble with school visits to principal's office

As a child in school I was (or had)

51

overall a poor student slow learner

56

trouble with mathematics or numbers

59

not achieving up to potential

May be particularly useful in assessing mood lability symptoms of ADHD.

Website links are true and correct at the time of publication.

Jump to:

Scales used in clinical trials

Safety scales
References

46. DuPaul GJ. Parent and teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms: Psychometric properties in a community-based sample. J Clin Child Psychol. 1991; 20:242.
48. DuPaul GJ, Power TJ, Anastopoulos AD, Reid R. ADHD Rating Scale-5: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation. New York: The Guilford Press; 2018.
56. Adler L, Cohen J. Diagnosis and evaluation of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2004;27(2):187-201.
57. Kessler RC, Green JG, Adler LA, Barkley RA, Chatterji S, Faraone SV, et al. The structure and diagnosis of adult ADHD: an analysis of expanded symptom criteria from the Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale (ACDS). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(11):1168–1178.
58. Ustun B, Adler LA, Rudin C, et al. The world health organization adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder self-report screening scale for DSM-5. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:520-526.
59. Spencer TJ, Adler LA, Saylor KE, et al. Validation of the adult ADHD investigator symptom rating scale (AISRS). J Attention Disorders. 2010;14(1):57–68.
60. Rapoport J. Rating scales and assessment for use in paediatric psychopharmacology research: Clinical Global Impression. Psychopharmacology Bulletin. 1985;21:839-841.
63. Wigal SB, Wigal TL: The laboratory school protocol: Its origin, use, and new applications. J Atten Disord. 2006;10:92–111.
64. Swanson, JM. School-based assessments and interventions for ADD students. K.C. Publishing; Irvine, CA: 1992.
65. Wender PH, Ward MF, Reimherr FW, Marchant BK. ADHD in adults. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;39:543.
66. Ward MF, Wender PH, Reimherr FW. The Wender Utah Rating Scale: An aid in the retrospective diagnosis of childhood Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150:885-890.
75. Pennsylvania State University. STAT 509: Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials. 3.3: Experimental Design Terminology. Available at https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat509/node/21/.
76. Wigal SB, Wigal TL. The Laboratory School Protocol: Its origin, use, and new applications. Journal of Attention Disorders. 2006;10(1):92-111.